Hello Aspirants,
Welcome to Online English Test in AffairsCloud.com. We are starting LIC AAO Course 2016 and we are creating sample questions in English section, type of which will be asked in LIC AAO 2016 !!!
- Click Here to View Stratus: LIC AAO 2016 Course
- LIC AAO 2016: Reasoning Test
- LIC AAO 2016: Quants Test
- LIC AAO 2016: General Awareness Test
- LIC AAO 2016: Computer Awareness Test
- LIC AAO 2016: English Test
Help:- Share Our LIC AAO 2016 Course page to your Friends & FB Groups
_____________________________________________________________________
Quiz-summary
0 of 10 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
Information
All the Best
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 10 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 points, (0)
Categories
- English 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 10
1. Question
1 pointsCategory: EnglishThe pilot phase of the much publicised odd-even scheme in Delhi is now over. Besides Delhi, comprehensive plans are urgently needed to improve air quality across several Indian cities, such as Patna, Gwalior, Raipur, Ahmedabad, Lucknow, Kanpur, Ludhiana and Amritsar. Although policy interventions primarily target air pollution, it is important to note that traffic congestion has significant economic costs to society. How did Delhi fare on metrics of air quality and congestion – and what lessons should other cities draw from the experiment?
The stationary air pollution monitors of the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) indicate that average (ambient) PM 2.5 levels increased from 216 µg/m3 (26 – 31 Dec) to 331 µg/m3 (1 – 6 Jan) and subsequently declined to 308 µg/m3 (7 -11Jan). As per the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) PM 2.5 levels that exceed 250 µg/m3 correspond to an Air Quality Index of ‘Severe’. These levels affect healthy people and cause greater distress to those with existing heart or lung disease.
However, a spike in air pollution is not a predictor of failure just as a decline does not indicate policy success. This is because, in the short term, air pollution levels are dominated by meteorological conditions such as winds, rain and temperature.
While establishing a relationship between reduced car numbers and pollution levels is tenuous, the impact on traffic and congestion is purely a function of compliance levels. In order to understand the traffic mix during the odd-even experiment, the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) monitored traffic volumes at five important stretches across New Delhi for three weeks (the week before and two weeks of the implementation).
In the morning peak (9 am – 11 am) we observed that overall vehicle counts increased (by 10%) in the two weeks of January, as compared to the last week of December. However, taxis, 2-wheelers, 3-wheelers and private buses contributed significantly to this increase. The increase ranges from 12% for 3-wheelers to 138% for private buses. This does suggest increased use (or availability) of these alternate modes of transport.
However, the number of private cars remained unchanged. Anecdotal experiences (documented in social media) suggest that commuters experienced lesser congestion on the roads. Congestion data (as recorded from Google Maps), on the other hand, suggests that the travel times were not statistically different between the last week of December and the first week of January. The available metrics are confounding and no definitive conclusion can be made, on the impact of the scheme on traffic and congestion as well. One conjecture is that the baseline chosen for comparison (last week of December) does not represent typical Delhi traffic.
Despite the short lead time available to prepare for a full-scale monitoring, we also installed low-cost pollution sensors at five locations. We find that the readings (for PM2.5) closely follow those from DPCC (located in the vicinity of our sensors). There is a need to create a network of such low-cost sensors across our cities, and to make residents aware of pollution levels in their respective localities.
Which of the following cities are needed comprehensive plans urgently to improve air quality?
Correct
Incorrect
-
Question 2 of 10
2. Question
1 pointsCategory: EnglishThe pilot phase of the much publicised odd-even scheme in Delhi is now over. Besides Delhi, comprehensive plans are urgently needed to improve air quality across several Indian cities, such as Patna, Gwalior, Raipur, Ahmedabad, Lucknow, Kanpur, Ludhiana and Amritsar. Although policy interventions primarily target air pollution, it is important to note that traffic congestion has significant economic costs to society. How did Delhi fare on metrics of air quality and congestion – and what lessons should other cities draw from the experiment?
The stationary air pollution monitors of the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) indicate that average (ambient) PM 2.5 levels increased from 216 µg/m3 (26 – 31 Dec) to 331 µg/m3 (1 – 6 Jan) and subsequently declined to 308 µg/m3 (7 -11Jan). As per the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) PM 2.5 levels that exceed 250 µg/m3 correspond to an Air Quality Index of ‘Severe’. These levels affect healthy people and cause greater distress to those with existing heart or lung disease.
However, a spike in air pollution is not a predictor of failure just as a decline does not indicate policy success. This is because, in the short term, air pollution levels are dominated by meteorological conditions such as winds, rain and temperature.
While establishing a relationship between reduced car numbers and pollution levels is tenuous, the impact on traffic and congestion is purely a function of compliance levels. In order to understand the traffic mix during the odd-even experiment, the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) monitored traffic volumes at five important stretches across New Delhi for three weeks (the week before and two weeks of the implementation).
In the morning peak (9 am – 11 am) we observed that overall vehicle counts increased (by 10%) in the two weeks of January, as compared to the last week of December. However, taxis, 2-wheelers, 3-wheelers and private buses contributed significantly to this increase. The increase ranges from 12% for 3-wheelers to 138% for private buses. This does suggest increased use (or availability) of these alternate modes of transport.
However, the number of private cars remained unchanged. Anecdotal experiences (documented in social media) suggest that commuters experienced lesser congestion on the roads. Congestion data (as recorded from Google Maps), on the other hand, suggests that the travel times were not statistically different between the last week of December and the first week of January. The available metrics are confounding and no definitive conclusion can be made, on the impact of the scheme on traffic and congestion as well. One conjecture is that the baseline chosen for comparison (last week of December) does not represent typical Delhi traffic.
Despite the short lead time available to prepare for a full-scale monitoring, we also installed low-cost pollution sensors at five locations. We find that the readings (for PM2.5) closely follow those from DPCC (located in the vicinity of our sensors). There is a need to create a network of such low-cost sensors across our cities, and to make residents aware of pollution levels in their respective localities.
Find the incorrect statement on the basis of the given passage?
Correct
Incorrect
-
Question 3 of 10
3. Question
1 pointsCategory: EnglishThe pilot phase of the much publicised odd-even scheme in Delhi is now over. Besides Delhi, comprehensive plans are urgently needed to improve air quality across several Indian cities, such as Patna, Gwalior, Raipur, Ahmedabad, Lucknow, Kanpur, Ludhiana and Amritsar. Although policy interventions primarily target air pollution, it is important to note that traffic congestion has significant economic costs to society. How did Delhi fare on metrics of air quality and congestion – and what lessons should other cities draw from the experiment?
The stationary air pollution monitors of the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) indicate that average (ambient) PM 2.5 levels increased from 216 µg/m3 (26 – 31 Dec) to 331 µg/m3 (1 – 6 Jan) and subsequently declined to 308 µg/m3 (7 -11Jan). As per the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) PM 2.5 levels that exceed 250 µg/m3 correspond to an Air Quality Index of ‘Severe’. These levels affect healthy people and cause greater distress to those with existing heart or lung disease.
However, a spike in air pollution is not a predictor of failure just as a decline does not indicate policy success. This is because, in the short term, air pollution levels are dominated by meteorological conditions such as winds, rain and temperature.
While establishing a relationship between reduced car numbers and pollution levels is tenuous, the impact on traffic and congestion is purely a function of compliance levels. In order to understand the traffic mix during the odd-even experiment, the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) monitored traffic volumes at five important stretches across New Delhi for three weeks (the week before and two weeks of the implementation).
In the morning peak (9 am – 11 am) we observed that overall vehicle counts increased (by 10%) in the two weeks of January, as compared to the last week of December. However, taxis, 2-wheelers, 3-wheelers and private buses contributed significantly to this increase. The increase ranges from 12% for 3-wheelers to 138% for private buses. This does suggest increased use (or availability) of these alternate modes of transport.
However, the number of private cars remained unchanged. Anecdotal experiences (documented in social media) suggest that commuters experienced lesser congestion on the roads. Congestion data (as recorded from Google Maps), on the other hand, suggests that the travel times were not statistically different between the last week of December and the first week of January. The available metrics are confounding and no definitive conclusion can be made, on the impact of the scheme on traffic and congestion as well. One conjecture is that the baseline chosen for comparison (last week of December) does not represent typical Delhi traffic.
Despite the short lead time available to prepare for a full-scale monitoring, we also installed low-cost pollution sensors at five locations. We find that the readings (for PM2.5) closely follow those from DPCC (located in the vicinity of our sensors). There is a need to create a network of such low-cost sensors across our cities, and to make residents aware of pollution levels in their respective localities.
Choose the word which is MOST SIMILAR in meaning to the word ‘ interventions ‘ as used in the passage?
Correct
Incorrect
-
Question 4 of 10
4. Question
1 pointsCategory: EnglishThe pilot phase of the much publicised odd-even scheme in Delhi is now over. Besides Delhi, comprehensive plans are urgently needed to improve air quality across several Indian cities, such as Patna, Gwalior, Raipur, Ahmedabad, Lucknow, Kanpur, Ludhiana and Amritsar. Although policy interventions primarily target air pollution, it is important to note that traffic congestion has significant economic costs to society. How did Delhi fare on metrics of air quality and congestion – and what lessons should other cities draw from the experiment?
The stationary air pollution monitors of the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) indicate that average (ambient) PM 2.5 levels increased from 216 µg/m3 (26 – 31 Dec) to 331 µg/m3 (1 – 6 Jan) and subsequently declined to 308 µg/m3 (7 -11Jan). As per the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) PM 2.5 levels that exceed 250 µg/m3 correspond to an Air Quality Index of ‘Severe’. These levels affect healthy people and cause greater distress to those with existing heart or lung disease.
However, a spike in air pollution is not a predictor of failure just as a decline does not indicate policy success. This is because, in the short term, air pollution levels are dominated by meteorological conditions such as winds, rain and temperature.
While establishing a relationship between reduced car numbers and pollution levels is tenuous, the impact on traffic and congestion is purely a function of compliance levels. In order to understand the traffic mix during the odd-even experiment, the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) monitored traffic volumes at five important stretches across New Delhi for three weeks (the week before and two weeks of the implementation).
In the morning peak (9 am – 11 am) we observed that overall vehicle counts increased (by 10%) in the two weeks of January, as compared to the last week of December. However, taxis, 2-wheelers, 3-wheelers and private buses contributed significantly to this increase. The increase ranges from 12% for 3-wheelers to 138% for private buses. This does suggest increased use (or availability) of these alternate modes of transport.
However, the number of private cars remained unchanged. Anecdotal experiences (documented in social media) suggest that commuters experienced lesser congestion on the roads. Congestion data (as recorded from Google Maps), on the other hand, suggests that the travel times were not statistically different between the last week of December and the first week of January. The available metrics are confounding and no definitive conclusion can be made, on the impact of the scheme on traffic and congestion as well. One conjecture is that the baseline chosen for comparison (last week of December) does not represent typical Delhi traffic.
Despite the short lead time available to prepare for a full-scale monitoring, we also installed low-cost pollution sensors at five locations. We find that the readings (for PM2.5) closely follow those from DPCC (located in the vicinity of our sensors). There is a need to create a network of such low-cost sensors across our cities, and to make residents aware of pollution levels in their respective localities.
Choose the word which is MOST OPPOSITE in meaning of the word ‘ congestion ‘ as used in the passage?
Correct
Incorrect
-
Question 5 of 10
5. Question
1 pointsCategory: EnglishThe pilot phase of the much publicised odd-even scheme in Delhi is now over. Besides Delhi, comprehensive plans are urgently needed to improve air quality across several Indian cities, such as Patna, Gwalior, Raipur, Ahmedabad, Lucknow, Kanpur, Ludhiana and Amritsar. Although policy interventions primarily target air pollution, it is important to note that traffic congestion has significant economic costs to society. How did Delhi fare on metrics of air quality and congestion – and what lessons should other cities draw from the experiment?
The stationary air pollution monitors of the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) indicate that average (ambient) PM 2.5 levels increased from 216 µg/m3 (26 – 31 Dec) to 331 µg/m3 (1 – 6 Jan) and subsequently declined to 308 µg/m3 (7 -11Jan). As per the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) PM 2.5 levels that exceed 250 µg/m3 correspond to an Air Quality Index of ‘Severe’. These levels affect healthy people and cause greater distress to those with existing heart or lung disease.
However, a spike in air pollution is not a predictor of failure just as a decline does not indicate policy success. This is because, in the short term, air pollution levels are dominated by meteorological conditions such as winds, rain and temperature.
While establishing a relationship between reduced car numbers and pollution levels is tenuous, the impact on traffic and congestion is purely a function of compliance levels. In order to understand the traffic mix during the odd-even experiment, the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) monitored traffic volumes at five important stretches across New Delhi for three weeks (the week before and two weeks of the implementation).
In the morning peak (9 am – 11 am) we observed that overall vehicle counts increased (by 10%) in the two weeks of January, as compared to the last week of December. However, taxis, 2-wheelers, 3-wheelers and private buses contributed significantly to this increase. The increase ranges from 12% for 3-wheelers to 138% for private buses. This does suggest increased use (or availability) of these alternate modes of transport.
However, the number of private cars remained unchanged. Anecdotal experiences (documented in social media) suggest that commuters experienced lesser congestion on the roads. Congestion data (as recorded from Google Maps), on the other hand, suggests that the travel times were not statistically different between the last week of December and the first week of January. The available metrics are confounding and no definitive conclusion can be made, on the impact of the scheme on traffic and congestion as well. One conjecture is that the baseline chosen for comparison (last week of December) does not represent typical Delhi traffic.
Despite the short lead time available to prepare for a full-scale monitoring, we also installed low-cost pollution sensors at five locations. We find that the readings (for PM2.5) closely follow those from DPCC (located in the vicinity of our sensors). There is a need to create a network of such low-cost sensors across our cities, and to make residents aware of pollution levels in their respective localities.
According to the author, what we need to installed in our cities for traffic control?
Correct
Incorrect
-
Question 6 of 10
6. Question
1 pointsCategory: EnglishThe pilot phase of the much publicised odd-even scheme in Delhi is now over. Besides Delhi, comprehensive plans are urgently needed to improve air quality across several Indian cities, such as Patna, Gwalior, Raipur, Ahmedabad, Lucknow, Kanpur, Ludhiana and Amritsar. Although policy interventions primarily target air pollution, it is important to note that traffic congestion has significant economic costs to society. How did Delhi fare on metrics of air quality and congestion – and what lessons should other cities draw from the experiment?
The stationary air pollution monitors of the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) indicate that average (ambient) PM 2.5 levels increased from 216 µg/m3 (26 – 31 Dec) to 331 µg/m3 (1 – 6 Jan) and subsequently declined to 308 µg/m3 (7 -11Jan). As per the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) PM 2.5 levels that exceed 250 µg/m3 correspond to an Air Quality Index of ‘Severe’. These levels affect healthy people and cause greater distress to those with existing heart or lung disease.
However, a spike in air pollution is not a predictor of failure just as a decline does not indicate policy success. This is because, in the short term, air pollution levels are dominated by meteorological conditions such as winds, rain and temperature.
While establishing a relationship between reduced car numbers and pollution levels is tenuous, the impact on traffic and congestion is purely a function of compliance levels. In order to understand the traffic mix during the odd-even experiment, the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) monitored traffic volumes at five important stretches across New Delhi for three weeks (the week before and two weeks of the implementation).
In the morning peak (9 am – 11 am) we observed that overall vehicle counts increased (by 10%) in the two weeks of January, as compared to the last week of December. However, taxis, 2-wheelers, 3-wheelers and private buses contributed significantly to this increase. The increase ranges from 12% for 3-wheelers to 138% for private buses. This does suggest increased use (or availability) of these alternate modes of transport.
However, the number of private cars remained unchanged. Anecdotal experiences (documented in social media) suggest that commuters experienced lesser congestion on the roads. Congestion data (as recorded from Google Maps), on the other hand, suggests that the travel times were not statistically different between the last week of December and the first week of January. The available metrics are confounding and no definitive conclusion can be made, on the impact of the scheme on traffic and congestion as well. One conjecture is that the baseline chosen for comparison (last week of December) does not represent typical Delhi traffic.
Despite the short lead time available to prepare for a full-scale monitoring, we also installed low-cost pollution sensors at five locations. We find that the readings (for PM2.5) closely follow those from DPCC (located in the vicinity of our sensors). There is a need to create a network of such low-cost sensors across our cities, and to make residents aware of pollution levels in their respective localities.
Choose the word which is MOST OPPOSITE in meaning of the word ‘ confounding ‘ as used in the passage?
Correct
Incorrect
-
Question 7 of 10
7. Question
1 pointsCategory: EnglishThe pilot phase of the much publicised odd-even scheme in Delhi is now over. Besides Delhi, comprehensive plans are urgently needed to improve air quality across several Indian cities, such as Patna, Gwalior, Raipur, Ahmedabad, Lucknow, Kanpur, Ludhiana and Amritsar. Although policy interventions primarily target air pollution, it is important to note that traffic congestion has significant economic costs to society. How did Delhi fare on metrics of air quality and congestion – and what lessons should other cities draw from the experiment?
The stationary air pollution monitors of the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) indicate that average (ambient) PM 2.5 levels increased from 216 µg/m3 (26 – 31 Dec) to 331 µg/m3 (1 – 6 Jan) and subsequently declined to 308 µg/m3 (7 -11Jan). As per the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) PM 2.5 levels that exceed 250 µg/m3 correspond to an Air Quality Index of ‘Severe’. These levels affect healthy people and cause greater distress to those with existing heart or lung disease.
However, a spike in air pollution is not a predictor of failure just as a decline does not indicate policy success. This is because, in the short term, air pollution levels are dominated by meteorological conditions such as winds, rain and temperature.
While establishing a relationship between reduced car numbers and pollution levels is tenuous, the impact on traffic and congestion is purely a function of compliance levels. In order to understand the traffic mix during the odd-even experiment, the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) monitored traffic volumes at five important stretches across New Delhi for three weeks (the week before and two weeks of the implementation).
In the morning peak (9 am – 11 am) we observed that overall vehicle counts increased (by 10%) in the two weeks of January, as compared to the last week of December. However, taxis, 2-wheelers, 3-wheelers and private buses contributed significantly to this increase. The increase ranges from 12% for 3-wheelers to 138% for private buses. This does suggest increased use (or availability) of these alternate modes of transport.
However, the number of private cars remained unchanged. Anecdotal experiences (documented in social media) suggest that commuters experienced lesser congestion on the roads. Congestion data (as recorded from Google Maps), on the other hand, suggests that the travel times were not statistically different between the last week of December and the first week of January. The available metrics are confounding and no definitive conclusion can be made, on the impact of the scheme on traffic and congestion as well. One conjecture is that the baseline chosen for comparison (last week of December) does not represent typical Delhi traffic.
Despite the short lead time available to prepare for a full-scale monitoring, we also installed low-cost pollution sensors at five locations. We find that the readings (for PM2.5) closely follow those from DPCC (located in the vicinity of our sensors). There is a need to create a network of such low-cost sensors across our cities, and to make residents aware of pollution levels in their respective localities.
Which of the following is ‘true’ in the context of the passage?
Correct
Incorrect
-
Question 8 of 10
8. Question
1 pointsCategory: EnglishThe pilot phase of the much publicised odd-even scheme in Delhi is now over. Besides Delhi, comprehensive plans are urgently needed to improve air quality across several Indian cities, such as Patna, Gwalior, Raipur, Ahmedabad, Lucknow, Kanpur, Ludhiana and Amritsar. Although policy interventions primarily target air pollution, it is important to note that traffic congestion has significant economic costs to society. How did Delhi fare on metrics of air quality and congestion – and what lessons should other cities draw from the experiment?
The stationary air pollution monitors of the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) indicate that average (ambient) PM 2.5 levels increased from 216 µg/m3 (26 – 31 Dec) to 331 µg/m3 (1 – 6 Jan) and subsequently declined to 308 µg/m3 (7 -11Jan). As per the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) PM 2.5 levels that exceed 250 µg/m3 correspond to an Air Quality Index of ‘Severe’. These levels affect healthy people and cause greater distress to those with existing heart or lung disease.
However, a spike in air pollution is not a predictor of failure just as a decline does not indicate policy success. This is because, in the short term, air pollution levels are dominated by meteorological conditions such as winds, rain and temperature.
While establishing a relationship between reduced car numbers and pollution levels is tenuous, the impact on traffic and congestion is purely a function of compliance levels. In order to understand the traffic mix during the odd-even experiment, the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) monitored traffic volumes at five important stretches across New Delhi for three weeks (the week before and two weeks of the implementation).
In the morning peak (9 am – 11 am) we observed that overall vehicle counts increased (by 10%) in the two weeks of January, as compared to the last week of December. However, taxis, 2-wheelers, 3-wheelers and private buses contributed significantly to this increase. The increase ranges from 12% for 3-wheelers to 138% for private buses. This does suggest increased use (or availability) of these alternate modes of transport.
However, the number of private cars remained unchanged. Anecdotal experiences (documented in social media) suggest that commuters experienced lesser congestion on the roads. Congestion data (as recorded from Google Maps), on the other hand, suggests that the travel times were not statistically different between the last week of December and the first week of January. The available metrics are confounding and no definitive conclusion can be made, on the impact of the scheme on traffic and congestion as well. One conjecture is that the baseline chosen for comparison (last week of December) does not represent typical Delhi traffic.
Despite the short lead time available to prepare for a full-scale monitoring, we also installed low-cost pollution sensors at five locations. We find that the readings (for PM2.5) closely follow those from DPCC (located in the vicinity of our sensors). There is a need to create a network of such low-cost sensors across our cities, and to make residents aware of pollution levels in their respective localities.
Choose the word which is MOST SIMILAR in meaning to the word ‘ compliance’ as used in the passage?
Correct
Incorrect
-
Question 9 of 10
9. Question
1 pointsCategory: EnglishThe pilot phase of the much publicised odd-even scheme in Delhi is now over. Besides Delhi, comprehensive plans are urgently needed to improve air quality across several Indian cities, such as Patna, Gwalior, Raipur, Ahmedabad, Lucknow, Kanpur, Ludhiana and Amritsar. Although policy interventions primarily target air pollution, it is important to note that traffic congestion has significant economic costs to society. How did Delhi fare on metrics of air quality and congestion – and what lessons should other cities draw from the experiment?
The stationary air pollution monitors of the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) indicate that average (ambient) PM 2.5 levels increased from 216 µg/m3 (26 – 31 Dec) to 331 µg/m3 (1 – 6 Jan) and subsequently declined to 308 µg/m3 (7 -11Jan). As per the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) PM 2.5 levels that exceed 250 µg/m3 correspond to an Air Quality Index of ‘Severe’. These levels affect healthy people and cause greater distress to those with existing heart or lung disease.
However, a spike in air pollution is not a predictor of failure just as a decline does not indicate policy success. This is because, in the short term, air pollution levels are dominated by meteorological conditions such as winds, rain and temperature.
While establishing a relationship between reduced car numbers and pollution levels is tenuous, the impact on traffic and congestion is purely a function of compliance levels. In order to understand the traffic mix during the odd-even experiment, the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) monitored traffic volumes at five important stretches across New Delhi for three weeks (the week before and two weeks of the implementation).
In the morning peak (9 am – 11 am) we observed that overall vehicle counts increased (by 10%) in the two weeks of January, as compared to the last week of December. However, taxis, 2-wheelers, 3-wheelers and private buses contributed significantly to this increase. The increase ranges from 12% for 3-wheelers to 138% for private buses. This does suggest increased use (or availability) of these alternate modes of transport.
However, the number of private cars remained unchanged. Anecdotal experiences (documented in social media) suggest that commuters experienced lesser congestion on the roads. Congestion data (as recorded from Google Maps), on the other hand, suggests that the travel times were not statistically different between the last week of December and the first week of January. The available metrics are confounding and no definitive conclusion can be made, on the impact of the scheme on traffic and congestion as well. One conjecture is that the baseline chosen for comparison (last week of December) does not represent typical Delhi traffic.
Despite the short lead time available to prepare for a full-scale monitoring, we also installed low-cost pollution sensors at five locations. We find that the readings (for PM2.5) closely follow those from DPCC (located in the vicinity of our sensors). There is a need to create a network of such low-cost sensors across our cities, and to make residents aware of pollution levels in their respective localities.
What is the central theme of the passage?
Correct
Incorrect
-
Question 10 of 10
10. Question
1 pointsCategory: EnglishThe pilot phase of the much publicised odd-even scheme in Delhi is now over. Besides Delhi, comprehensive plans are urgently needed to improve air quality across several Indian cities, such as Patna, Gwalior, Raipur, Ahmedabad, Lucknow, Kanpur, Ludhiana and Amritsar. Although policy interventions primarily target air pollution, it is important to note that traffic congestion has significant economic costs to society. How did Delhi fare on metrics of air quality and congestion – and what lessons should other cities draw from the experiment?
The stationary air pollution monitors of the Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) indicate that average (ambient) PM 2.5 levels increased from 216 µg/m3 (26 – 31 Dec) to 331 µg/m3 (1 – 6 Jan) and subsequently declined to 308 µg/m3 (7 -11Jan). As per the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) PM 2.5 levels that exceed 250 µg/m3 correspond to an Air Quality Index of ‘Severe’. These levels affect healthy people and cause greater distress to those with existing heart or lung disease.
However, a spike in air pollution is not a predictor of failure just as a decline does not indicate policy success. This is because, in the short term, air pollution levels are dominated by meteorological conditions such as winds, rain and temperature.
While establishing a relationship between reduced car numbers and pollution levels is tenuous, the impact on traffic and congestion is purely a function of compliance levels. In order to understand the traffic mix during the odd-even experiment, the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW) monitored traffic volumes at five important stretches across New Delhi for three weeks (the week before and two weeks of the implementation).
In the morning peak (9 am – 11 am) we observed that overall vehicle counts increased (by 10%) in the two weeks of January, as compared to the last week of December. However, taxis, 2-wheelers, 3-wheelers and private buses contributed significantly to this increase. The increase ranges from 12% for 3-wheelers to 138% for private buses. This does suggest increased use (or availability) of these alternate modes of transport.
However, the number of private cars remained unchanged. Anecdotal experiences (documented in social media) suggest that commuters experienced lesser congestion on the roads. Congestion data (as recorded from Google Maps), on the other hand, suggests that the travel times were not statistically different between the last week of December and the first week of January. The available metrics are confounding and no definitive conclusion can be made, on the impact of the scheme on traffic and congestion as well. One conjecture is that the baseline chosen for comparison (last week of December) does not represent typical Delhi traffic.
Despite the short lead time available to prepare for a full-scale monitoring, we also installed low-cost pollution sensors at five locations. We find that the readings (for PM2.5) closely follow those from DPCC (located in the vicinity of our sensors). There is a need to create a network of such low-cost sensors across our cities, and to make residents aware of pollution levels in their respective localities.
Choose the word which is MOST SIMILAR in meaning to the word ‘ conjecture’ as used in the passage?
Correct
Incorrect
_____________________________________________________________________
- Note:- We are providing unique questions for you to practice well, have a try !!
- Ask your doubt in comment section, AC Mod’s ll clear your doubts in caring way.