Hello Aspirants.
Welcome to Online English Section with explanation inAffairs Cloud.com. Here we are creating question sample inCloze test, which is BASED ON IBPS PO/CLERK/LIC AAO/RRB & SSC CGL EXAM and other competitive exams !!!
By holding a meeting on the Indus Waters Treaty and scheduling another later this week on MFN (Most Favoured Nation) status to Pakistan, Prime Minister Narendra Modi has signalled his intent to examine all the non-military options before the government for a strong (1) to the Uri attack. “Blood and Water cannot flow together,” he is reported to have said. However, after the meeting, officials made it clear that the IWT will hold, at least for the moment. Instead, the Centre (2) up a list of measures to optimise use of the Indus waters, that India has so far failed to do. The fact is that (3) the IWT is a non-starter as an option, and the holding of the meeting at this (4) ill-considered. For one, it confused the message in Mr. Modi’s Kozhikode speech, appealing to Pakistani citizens’ better (5) to “wage a war on poverty”. More important, the 1960 treaty for the Indus and five tributaries flowing from India to Pakistan was (6) by the World Bank (then, the IBRD), and has held through wars and conflicts along the Line of Control. Revoking it would threaten regional stability and India’s credibility globally. It remains unclear what India intends to do with the “western” rivers in question beyond the short-term plan to irrigate Jammu and Kashmir’s fields better. Dams required to hold the course of the (7) of the Indus to alter water levels to Pakistan dramatically would take more than a decade to build. Given the environmental and geopolitical consequences of such actions, they are unlikely to elicit any international funding.
It is clear that the Centre didn’t think through its next steps when it declared with a grand flourish, (8) by frenzied television headlines, that the Prime Minister would “review” the Treaty. But it did limit the potential damage by bringing down the heated rhetoric with a rational analysis on the Treaty. It would be wise if India proceeds with a sense of (9) caution in making further statements on Pakistan — for instance, revoking the MFN status will hardly punish Pakistan’s economy given the low levels of bilateral trade. Terrorist attacks such as the one at Uri require a combination of measured but firm responses, rather than weighing every option in full public view. India cannot also ignore the fact that the Uri attack has exposed the need to shore up its defences. As India has realised time and again, its response to (10) must carry the message that the country is dependable and not given to irrational, irresponsible actions that its neighbour is often prone to.
- 1) response
2) action
3) perception
4) request
5) questionAnswer – 1)
Explanation : response - 1) repulse
2) repel
3) propel
4) drew
5) exhaleAnswer – 4)
Explanation : drew - 1) concrete
2) undeniable
3) unequivocal
4) abrogating
5) downrightAnswer – 4)
Explanation : abrogating - 1) detachment
2) disunion
3) gratitude
4) gulf
5) junctureAnswer –5)
Explanation : juncture - 1) instincts
2) acumen
3) apprehension
4) argumentation
5) ratiocinationAnswer – 1)
Explanation : instincts - 1) brokered
2) dhere
3) append
4) annex
5) fastenAnswer – 1)
Explanation : brokered - 1) annihilate
2) affiliation
3) tributaries
4) accusation
5) blameAnswer – 3)
Explanation : tributaries - 1) frank
2) forthright
3) straightforward
4) absolute
5) amplifiedAnswer – 5)
Explanation : amplified - 1) radical
2) pragmatic
3) idealistic
4) optimistic
5) quixoticAnswer – 2)
Explanation : pragmatic - 1) provocation
2) prevention
3) repression
4) alligation
5) suppressionAnswer – 1)
Explanation : provocation
